by Brandon Smith
After all the hollow and uninspired elections that this country has
suffered through over the past several decades, one might think that at
some point long ago the American public would have finally struck a
plateau of disenfranchisement; that we could sink no further into
despondency, that there is a saturation limit to the corruption of our
voting process. Unfortunately, there has been no such luck. I have to
say that in all honesty I have never seen more people gut jumbled and
disgusted with our electoral system than I have in 2012. Sure, there is
still a hyper-gullible segment of the populous that continues to play
the game, but even those idiots are beginning to admit that the choices
offered are dismal at best, catastrophic at worst. The fog of the false
Left/Right paradigm is starting to lift, and all that lay in its wake
is a hoard of lost wide-eyed flabbergasted followers without a coattail
or a talking point to cling to. Sudanese refugees have a better chance
of survival than these people do…
Even in the more obvious of
fraudulent past elections there was at least an attempt by the
establishment to present a pageant of conflicting ideologies (George W.
Bush vs. John Kerry comes to mind). There has always been the Democrat
who pretends to be anti-war, or the Republican who pretends to be small
government, or the Democrat who pretends to defend our right to privacy,
and the Republican who pretends to be pro-2nd Amendment. But in 2012,
even the theater of rhetoric has disappeared. Both primary party
candidates seem to be sharing the same intestinal tract and the same
teleprompter, and now, the average American is asking a new set of
questions. They do not wonder how these men will change things for the
better. Not at all. Instead, they wonder which one will do LESS DAMAGE
while in office. This is the terrible reality we have come to
understand in our society today. It is a sad awakening, but a necessary
one.
As you read this now, the new President of the United
States is being “chosen” or has been chosen. Whoever the “winner”
happens to be is ultimately irrelevant. They do not count. They are
mascots. Middle management cronies running through the motions to
distract the masses while enacting the policies of their superiors.
They are fry cooks serving greasy overpriced democracy with no real
sustenance. What does matter, though, is what comes next. I’m sorry to
say that the idea that one man will do less damage than the other is a
naïve sentiment. Democrat? Republican? Obama? Romney? The crimes
and calamities wrought will be exactly the same. Take a look into my
crystal ball and see the future. Here is how the winner will destroy
America…
1) He Will Continue The Policy Of Dollar Devaluation
Neither
candidate has expressed any interest through the election or even
before it to protect the value of our currency, and both candidates have
supported steps towards quantitative easing and fiat printing in order
to delay an inevitable national debt crisis. Both Romney and Obama have
sung the praises of Ben Bernanke (Romney changed his tune just in time
for his campaign, but who's buying that?) and the private Federal
Reserve despite the consistent failures of that despotic institution to
produce any tangible economic results with their Keynesian methods.
The
dollar will see a vast devaluation during the term of this candidate
and a loss of world reserve status, leading to stagflation (a
combination of the worst elements of deflationary and inflationary
crises in the same event). Skyrocketing prices and crumbling
unemployment will be the highlights of his presidency, because he will
never take measures to reign in or dismantle the primary root cause of
the problem; the Federal Reserve itself.
2) He Will Continue Extreme Government Debt Spending
Neither
candidate has offered a practical or operable solution to the $16
trillion official national debt problem we now face, let alone the tens
of trillions of dollars in entitlement obligations that the Treasury
Department never talks about. A nation can only live off food stamps
and credit for so long before it implodes like a wet paper sack. And
this is exactly what we have become; an entire culture of debt addicts
and money hounds searching for our next fix of foreign or central bank
cash. The fact is, both Obama and Romney would INCREASE spending while
using fiat injections to buttress an ever weakening economy in the name
of “stability”. The new president will claim that if spending cuts are
initiated, it will send the U.S. financial system into a tailspin and a
“return” to recession conditions. This will of course be a lie. We
have not left recession/depression conditions since 2008.
3) He Will Support And Expand On Wars In The Middle East
There
is no such thing as a mainstream “anti-war candidate” in 2012. Not
even a fake one. Obama’s measures of state violence and complete lack
of respect for the sovereign internal matters of foreign nations surpass
the madness of George Bush Jr. He has even gone so far as to assert
that his office has the right to assassinate American citizens without
trial, evidence, or due process of the law. Not only has he asserted
the right to this power, he has used it! Romney’s position,
hilariously, is that Obama has not gone far enough! Either way, the
winner in 2012 is going to leap like a vile locust into new countries
and unleash a plague of laser guided death. The next president WILL be a
war hungry president.
4) He Will Lock Down The Web And Limit Internet Speech
Both
Romney and Obama have expressed a desire to establish cybersecurity
measures which include vast new governmental authority over the
functions and operations of the internet. The ultimate goal? To gain
legal precedence for the right to dictate web content, up to and
including the ability to label any website a subversive threat to
national security or a recruitment tool for “extremists”.
With
the establishment spreading completely baseless accusation of
cyberthreats coming from every corner of the globe (but mostly from
Iran) it would seem that they are conditioning the public for a future
encounter with a cyber event, and telling them who to blame when it
occurs. The problem is, the most prominent cyber security threats to
the internet in the past few years have come not from the Middle East,
or Russia, or China, but the U.S. and Israel (Stuxnet anyone?). Keep
this in mind when our new president blames the next cyber attack on a
convenient political target and then uses the event as an excuse to
regulate the web.
5) He Will Erase American Civil Liberties
This
president will find a reason, or he will create a reason to diminish
Constitutional protections including our right to trial and due
process. Both candidates have offered unflinching support for the
National Defense Authorization Act and its provisions for indefinite
detainment. Neither man has ventured any sincere concerns over the
broad nature of the language involved in the labeling of “terrorists”
and “extremists”. Literally anyone can now be categorized as an enemy
combatant and a threat to national security for almost any reason, and
this appears to be the way Obama and Romney like it. That is to say,
they both want totalitarian powers, or at the very least, they have made
no effort to turn them down.
It is important to note that there
has never been a government in history that sought out such powers and
did not actually use them. Only a fool would assume his favorite
elitist candidate in 2012 will not utilize the extreme authorities now
amassed for the executive branch over the past decade.
6) He Will Embrace A Globalist Dynamic And Abandon American Sovereignty
Both
Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are surrounded by “advisers” who are also
members of the Council On Foreign Relations, an institution which openly
calls for the dissolution of American sovereignty on a regular basis
and the creation of a centralized global system dominating the
financial, social, and political life of every nation in the world.
With the economic stability of the U.S. on the verge of oblivion, it is
very likely that a historic crisis will ensue during the first term of
the next president, and that he will in response suggest a new global
system as the solution.
This system has already been created,
in part, by the IMF and World Bank in concert with member governments
and revolves around the issuance of a new world reserve currency
(Special Drawing Rights) as the centerpiece. I can guarantee with
absolute certainty that the next president, regardless of who he happens
to be, will promote an IMF rescue package coupling the dollar to the
SDR and turning over full economic control of America to an
international body. He will make it sound rational, reasonable, and
even advantageous, but in the end, he will be selling the globalist
snakeoil he was conscripted to sell before his election campaign ever
started.
In 2012, it will not be about voting. It will not be
about “winning”. It will not even be about getting to the next
election. It will be about survival. As big a joke as the 2012
elections have become even to the generally unaware, I am not laughing.
I do not need to look at the promises of either candidate. I do not
need to weigh their incompetent quick fix policies. All I have to do is
look at the current downward trend and understand that the president,
whoever he may be, will continue it. If anything is to truly change, it
will be because we as Americans finally walk away from the game,
enacting our own solutions and our own opposition instead of handing
over our power to sniveling errand boys wrapped in flags and expensive
suits and self-rightousness every four years. 2012 is going to be the
beginning of upheaval and renewal, for better or for worse, and it is
certain that the guy in the White House into 2013, Republican or
Democrat, is going to be a part of the problem, nothing more…
2 comments:
The last point is the worst, for it sums up an attitude that leads to the other points.
The last point (Abandon American Sovereignty) is the most damning, for it is the driving force behind the preceding points.
Post a Comment